As rightly pointed out a great teacher when we speak of "education" we should use this term in the only sense that is his point of view etymological and derived from the Latin verb " EDUCATING " composed of the particle ex (from, in, out) and ducere (lead, draw).
The etymological explanation is accepted fact indicates that this verb: "to help with the appropriate discipline to put into effect in svolgerele good inclinations of the soul and the powers of mind, and to fight the inclination is not good: it is led out the men from the defects of the original rough nature, character and instilling clothes politeness . Otherwise, rearing, instruct. "
In terms of purely philosophical but the questions raise doubts. The word seems to lose its formal element acquistarne uno concettualmente molto più neutro: ossia che il termine "educazione" possa anche predisporre l'uomo ad un comportamento non propriamente corretto, almeno secondo i canoni comuni.
In considerazione di questo possiamo pensare che da un individuo possa venire estrapolata non solo la parte migliore, ma anche quella peggiore che fa leva sulla malvagità, sulla perfidia e sulla scelleratezza, perchè purtroppo tutto ciò è una realtà. Quanto bene conosciamo alcuni esempi di cattivi maestri che purtroppo formano altrettanto terribili discepoli!
have much of this discourse philosophers and poets and, turning his gaze to a distant memory and the past high school, I remember how, sophistication speaking, one can certainly argue about both senses of the word itself. Personally I would try some modern contextualization.
0 comments:
Post a Comment